Showing posts with label Tasawwuf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tasawwuf. Show all posts

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Saints, Sufis and Star Wars

(Excerpted from Q News, Issue No. 363)

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away noble Sufi shaykhs trained young
dervishes to battle dark powers that sought to lead people along the path of
hatred and anger.They floated through the air, walked on water and did
remarkable acrobatics - all by invoking the divine Force. Sound familiar? It’s better
than you think. IRFAN M. RYDHAN explores the secret relationship between Islam
and Star Wars.

Most Star Wars fans know that director George Lucas,
influenced chiefly by the works of the late American
scholar Joseph Campbell, took spiritual elements
common to many world religions to create the mystical fabric
of his epic saga of good versus evil. As a Muslim, I always
thought the Jedi to be what a true follower of Islam should be
like. Jedi masters, with their North African cloaks and scruffy
beards look like Sufi shaykhs, are taught to respect a greater
power, fight for the innocent and honour a code of morals and
ethics in order to bring about peace and justice in their societies
- exactly what the Islamic tradition prescribes. So what is
the connection between these seemingly ‘Islamic principles’
and the fictional Jedi Order of the Star Wars saga?

There is devotion to Star Wars that non-enthusiasts will
not understand. For example, National Statistics UK reported
that in its 2001 Census 390,000 respondents declared Jedi to
be their chosen religion. I am sometimes unsure whether devotion
to Star Wars has crossed the make-believe barrier or if
these Star Wars fans are just pulling our leg. There may be
some truth in fiction. And I think I know where some of the
truth of the Jedi comes from.

I came across an interesting article entitled Eternal Jihad:
The Way of the Mystic-Warrior from a Sufi website. It
revealed, “We are at the core a Movement of Jeddi; masters of
Futuwwat (“the Way of the mystic-warrior”). We encourage
adherents to train both physically and spiritually, for their
own personal edification and to enhance their knowledge and
abilities in the struggle. The Real does not lie alone in contemplation,
prayer and meditation; nor does it lie alone in
action and revolution. Both of these are notions of “one or the
other” and Allah is not ‘one or the other’. ‘Allah’ literally
means ‘the One[ness] which manifests from Nothing.’”
Note that the Arabic term al-Jeddi (master of the mystic-warrior
way) along with another Islamic term not mentioned,
palawan (perhaps from pahlwan, or strong young man in
Punjabi), similar to Lucas’ Padawan for Jedi apprentice, were
actual titles used by Muslim knights.

THE FORCE

The Force is the common thread between all six movies
and is defined as an energy field, which binds all living things
together, like Allah, God, a Supreme Being or power that most
religious adherents worship, follow and yearn to become a
part of. According to Star Wars mythology, the Jedi “are a
noble order of protectors unified by their belief and observance
of the Force.” The Jedi study and train under the
apprentice-master relationship similar to how many religious
students study under a priest or religious scholar until they
have learned enough to teach and train the next generation of
students.

From a Muslim perspective, the similarities between the
Jedi and the Islamic traditions of instruction are strikingly similar.
For example, a Muslim scholar usually trains under a
shaykh for a number of years before they are given the right
or permission - ijazah - to teach others about Islam. As Martin
Nguyen points out, “In Islamic Sufism shaykhs will have silsilas
that list the chain of teachers going back to the Prophet
Muhammad. A silsila indicates a shaykh’s lineage of mystical
learning from which he draws his spiritual authority.”

Similarly in the Jedi tradition of Star Wars, each Padawan
(apprentice) is taught the same tradition and skills their Jedi
masters were taught by their previous masters. Star Wars fans
know the lineage of Jedi instruction starting from Yoda to
Count Dooku to Qui-Gon Jinn to Obi Wan Kenobi to Anakin
Skywalker.

In the first Star Wars movie, Episode IV: A New Hope,
Luke Skywalker, like his father, Anakin, lives in the desert
(incidentally, the desert planet of Tatooine was actually filmed
near the real desert town of Tataouine in Tunisia). From
among this remote desert area with no roots of a civilised
urban society, a ‘chosen one’ arises who brings the hope of
peace and justice to their society. Anakin is the chosen one in
the latest Star Wars films, and Luke can be considered the chosen
one from the original Star Wars trilogy.

Similarly, the Prophet of Islam (peace and blessings be
upon him) lived in the desert where there was no true rule of
law or justice and people followed the tribal system of blood
vengeance. Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, brought
Islam to the Arabs, which completely changed their way
beliefs, thinking and the way they lived their lives. Instead of
living for the present and for themselves, as Muslims they lived
for the hereafter and were taught to take care of the poor,
orphans, those less fortunate than themselves and to fight for
social justice and well being for the whole community.

Thus, the Jedi too is taught to be selfless and not selfish like
the Sith, an ancient order of Force-practitioners devoted to the
dark side and determined to destroy the Jedi. Just as Yoda, the
little green master, taught young padawans not to give into fear
and be tempted by the Dark Side - the temptations of the devil
or shaytan - Muslims are taught not to be attached to the life
of this world, the dunya, nor to fall prey to the diseases of the
heart like jealousy, envy, fear and especially hatred as they lead
to evil and sin.

THE GREEN ONE

There is an interesting connection between the Jedi master
Yoda (a short, green skinned creature first seen in Episode V:
The Empire Strikes Back) and Islamic traditions - the character
of al-Khidr means “the Green One” in Arabic. Some
Quranic commentators say that Khidr is one of the prophets,
others refer to him simply as a divinely sent guide and yet others
argue that he is a perfect wali, a friend and devoted servant
of God.

So in other words Yoda - the name itself comes from the
Hebrew for ‘wise one’ or from the Sanskrit for ‘warrior’ - is like
a spiritual mentor who guides the young Jedi in the ways of the
force and teaches them to be strong enough to resist the temptations
and evil inclinations of the Sith and other Dark Forces.

In Episode VI: Return of the Jedi, the Emperor tries to
influence Luke Skywalker to give into his feelings of anger and
hatred. As we all know Luke’s father Anakin, did fall prey to
the Emperor’s whispers and joined the Dark Side to become
the fearsome Darth Vader. Because the Jedi - like Muslim warriors
- are taught that one’s intentions in battle must be pure
and that it’s wrong to kill out of anger, even when is outwardly
justified.

Imam Ali, the fourth Caliph and the cousin of the Prophet
Muhammad, was faced with this situation at the Battle of the
Ditch. The noble Imam had knocked an enemy soldier to the
ground and was raising his sword to kill him, when the unbeliever
spat in his face. Imam Ali at once stood still and
refrained from killing his enemy and stated: “Your property
and your life have become sacrosanct to me. I am not authorized
to slay you. I can receive permission to kill only in holy
combat, in fighting commanded by Allah. Just a few moments
ago, I had overcome you in battle, knocked you to the ground
and was on the point of slaying you. But when you spat in my
face, my selfish anger was aroused against you. If I had killed
you, I would have slain you not for Allah’s sake but for my
own selfish reason; they would then have called me not a
champion warrior, but a murderer. When you spat in my face,
my selfish passion threatened to overwhelm me, so instead of
striking you with the sword for my own sake I struck my passion
for the sake of Allah, Exalted is He. There you have the
reason for your escape.”

The Jedi could be considered “Holy Warriors” (or
mujahideen) as they fight for truth, justice and peace. They
meditate (do dhikr) as much as they can, to become “one with
the force”, even in the midst of battle. In Episode I: The
Phantom Menace, the Jedi master, Qui-Gon Jinn begins to
meditate in the middle of his battle with his arch-nemesis
Darth Maul.

Islamic History is filled with stories of Muslim warriors
who stop in the heat of the battle to remember Allah and take
heed of the noble teachings of Islam. Imam Hussain the grandson
of the Prophet stopped to do his Asr prayers at Karbala.
There is even an account of Sayyidna Ali who completed his
prayers while he had an arrow stuck in his leg.

There is a saying in Islam, which states: “Life in this world
is Paradise for the unbelievers and a prison for the believers.”
Which basically means that if one puts all their faith in this
world - the dunya - then it is very easy to fall off the straight
path and be tempted by Satan to the “dark side”.

This is shown very clearly in Episode III: Revenge of the
Sith which is all about the Anakin’s fall into the dark side.
Lucas, himself stated in an interview that the he chose the final
battle between Anakin and Obi-Wan to be on a planet with
flowing molten lava and fire, which represents the fires of
Hell. It is the ultimate showdown between good and evil.

Anakin falls victim to the dark side because he loves power
and the dunya, as he wanted to have the power to live forever
and save his loved ones from death, in particular his wife from
dying during childbirth. He has excessive anger and arrogance,
as he felt he was the most powerful Jedi and no other
Jedi was better or stronger than him. He began to distrust
those who are his righteous guides. He felt Obi-Wan, his
Shaykh, was jealous of him and thought the Jedi Council - or
should we say shura - was against him, which lead him to follow
other sinister forces for guidance. Lastly he had hatred in
his heart and admitted to hating the “sand people”. He fell to
all those vices that Islam teaches the Muslim to avoid.

THE SAND PEOPLE

The sand people or the Tusken Raiders could be considered
a metaphor for the nomadic peoples of Arabia. In
Episode II: Attack of the Clones, the Tusken Raiders kidnap
and torture Anakin’s mother, Shimi, eventually killing her.
Anakin then proceeds to kill sand people in vengeance, and as
he tells his wife, that he ‘killed all of them, including the
women and children.’ But this did not relieve him of his anger
and hatred. I believe Lucas is trying to make a point about the
continuous spewing of hate against Arab and Muslim peoples,
specifically after September 11th. Even though the countries of
Iraq and Afghanistan were bombed relentlessly (it hasn’t
stopped yet), as punishment for the attacks of September 11th
(without any proof or legitimate legalities of course), many
Americans still have hatred against anyone that even looks like
an Arab or Muslim. Many innocent people, specifically
women and children, have been harassed, attacked and sometimes
even killed, because of this ‘hate’.

This wasn’t the only example of Lucas getting political.
After Episode III debuted at the Cannes Film Festival, many
Europeans were saying that Anakin represents Bush and his
Neo-Con cohorts currently in power. One couldn’t help but
notice the very overt examples in the last and final instalment
of the Star Wars series. Of course, the most obvious example
was when Anakin tells Obi-Wan before their final duel,
“Either you’re with me, or against me”, which sounds remarkably
like a current American President.

THE JEDI ARTS

One of the most popular aspects of the Star Wars films are
the exciting light-sabre duels and swordsmanship (Lucas is an
admitted fan of old Samurai films) and martial arts style fighting,
which of course originates from the East. As a former student
of Eskrima Serrada - stick and blade fighting developed
by Muslims of the Philippines - myself, I see many similarities
in the fast-moving and short-range fighting I studied and the
“invented” art of the Jedi masters.

When Anakin fights Count Dooku at the beginning of the
Episode III, he applies a disarm and cut technique that is
directly from the Eskrima tradition Dooku’s arm. The fighting
techniques in Star Wars are reminiscent of the Muslim martial
arts of Southeast Asia as exemplified by Pencak Silat and
Eskrima, which are based on paying attention to the limbs of
the attacker and not concerned with an immediate strike to the
attacker’s head or torso.

Ray Park, who plays Darth Maul in Episode I: The
Phantom Menace, studied Kung Fu (very similar to the empty
hand techniques of Serrada) and Wushu. He frequently travelled
to Malaysia to refine and develop his skills. The bases of
the Muslim martial arts of Southeast Asia are spiritual. This is
the local Sufi expression of Islam. Traditional Indonesian/Malay folklore attributes the initial design of these arts to Muslim saints in the region going back to the 7th
Century. The Silat system is attributed to nine main awliya or
saints, also called the Wali Songo.

Here is another example of the Sufi-Jedi connection. As
Jedi’s study the force and train in the Jedi Arts under the
apprentice-master relationship, so do the Sufis.

My research has shown me some remarkable similarities
between the spiritual world of Star Wars and the ideals, principles
and understanding of Islam. Some of the similarities are
clear - master/apprentice being shaykh/talib and the Force being
akin the creative presence of the divine in creation. Other similarities
were more hidden and surprising - the Jeddi and Palawan
Muslim knights and Yoda’s remarkable similarity to Khidr.

Even though Lucas himself is not a follower of any specific
religion, he has used elements of Islam to convey universal
understandings of good and evil. Combining the common
threads of the human experience with a futuristic space-age
setting and exciting martial arts swordsmanship, came a creation
that has inspired many, across religious lines. There is
something about the Star Wars saga that everyone can relate
to and enjoy. People searching for a “truth” within the
mythology of Star Wars, will hopefully look a little deeper
behind the fiction and find a way of life which emphasises
peace, justice and brotherhood for all humanity. Sounds like
Islamic ideals to me. 􀂄

Friday, December 3, 2010

Sheikh Hisham Kabbani @ The Melbourne Theosophical Society

On 2 December, the Melbourne Theosophical Society hosted a public talk by Sheikh Hisham Kabbani of the Naqshbandi Haqqani tariqa, which was part of his second visit to Australia (the first being in 2009). The Sheikh also brought his family along.

The MC's introduction (young members of the Sheikh's family in the foreground!)

Getting the microphone ready

Expounding a point (Ali Elsayed at immediate left)

The audience included his Australian-based murideen, members of the society, and various interested individuals. Sheikh Kabbani made a humorous entrance as he grabbed a handful of sweets from a bowl near the MC's podium and threw it into the crowd, in a move too fast for my camera finger to capture. Preceding his talk, Ali Elsayed performed several qasidas in his rich voice, assisted by a trio of backup drummers.

After the performance, Sheikh Kabbani began his talk in earnest, dealing with the subjects of the importance of having a spiritual guide, and how to cultivate one's spirituality in a hostile modern environment. Notable memories included his account of talking to a psychologist one day who advocated the daily counting of one's own good deeds. Sheikh Kabbani agreed somewhat with this concept, but emphasised the concept of counting one's bad deeds, as self-reflection biased in favour of the former often just serves to feed one's ego. He also exhorted the audience to practise regular meditation, using the analogy of the mind as a computer - uploading too much results in a crash which must be balanced by downloading (he possibly meant to use the words 'upload' and 'download' the other way around, but hey....), which is the use of meditation. Often when he mentioned the Prophet's name (s.a.w.), he would stand up from his seat in respect, also taking the audience with him!

I had the opportunity to ask him a question at the end. I wanted to know his opinion about I felt the use of the term 'Sufism' in lieu of 'tassawuf' contributed to the popular perception of  'Sufism' as a fringe sect of Islam, rather than its most central and profound science. The Sheikh mentioned in his reply  how 'Sufism' was essentially a western term. He said that tassawuf didn't have a name in the earliest history of Islam, but was a concrete reality, citing as an example the Ahl al-Suffa (People of the Bench/Platform), a group of poor Muslims who spent their days in constant worship, who for this purpose the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) actually allocated a corner of his mosque to.  He illustrated his point in a pithy statement, which essentially was that tassawuf used to be 'a reality without a name', but these days is 'a name without a reality'. He further stated the role of certain Muslim reform movement/s of the modern era (whose oil money and political and media influence far outstripped their actual status as a heterodox minority) in potraying tassawuf as a deviant practice. However, he also mentioned how these reformers are having difficulty getting out of the mess they created, citing as an example how a certain Wahabist newsletter/paper actually tried to assert that Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab practised tassawuf himself!

After answering my query the Sheikh finally took his leave, although not without having a woman or two from the audience apparently coming up to him to take bayat (Suleiman's note 12/12/10: my bad, apparently it wa just babies getting blessed)! Although I would have relished the opportunity to pick the Sheikh's brain further, the event was a valuable privilege which I was glad to take part in.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Intoxicating Salawat!

I found this absolutely wonderful recording on the website of a tassawuf group. It is the first entry on the page: "Salawat Damascus, recorded on site"

Enjoy!

Monday, September 20, 2010

The Donkey's Jihad on 'Sufism'




Greetings, my two-legged friends,

Long time readers (yes, plural!) would remember that one of the categories for labelling my posts was 'Sufism'. However,as of late I have deleted this as a category as replaced it with the term 'Tasawwuf'.

Though I was always aware of the superior appropriateness of this latter term, I was content to use 'Sufism', as it more or less served its taxonomical purpose, or so I thought, plus the fact that it is a much more familiar word with non-Muslims.

But this recent change is not just the outcome of pedantry. The words we choose to use have very real effects in life outside of the printed page or internet. I have noted as much in previous posts. Rather, my motivation comes from the realisation of the harms such careless use of language may produce.

The prevailing image of tasawwuf in the West is of whirling dervishes and fire-walking fakirs. Of the (often atrociously watered-down) poetry of Rumi (qaddasah Allahu sirrah, may God sanctify his mystery) and songs about love and wine. Tassawuf is seen as a kind of 'Islam-lite', a benign heresy, amusing distraction for spiritually-starved Westerners and happy-clappy solution to everything that is wrong with 'Muhammadanism'.

This is in complete ignorance of its central role in Islamic spiritual life. Tasawwuf is not some motely collection of eccentric practices. Rather, it is the internal dimension of worship itself.

It can be said that Islam consists of three parts, each with its corresponding science. The first, most basic element is Islam itself, used in its sense as a verb, meaning the act of submission to the Will of God. The science of Islam is fiqh, or religious jurisprudence. The second element is iman, or faith, a confidence in belief which comes as a logical outcome to the act of submission. Its corresponding science is aqidah or creed. The final element is ihsan, the perfection of worship. There is a hadith in the collection of Sahih Muslim which states this beautifully:

As we sat one day with the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace), a man in pure white clothing and jet black hair came to us, without a trace of travelling upon him, though none of us knew him.

He sat down before the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) bracing his knees against his, resting his hands on his legs, and said: "Muhammad, tell me about Islam." The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: "Islam is to testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and to perform the prayer, give zakat, fast in Ramadan, and perform the pilgrimage to the House if you can find a way."

He said: "You have spoken the truth," and we were surprised that he should ask and then confirm the answer. Then he said:
"Tell me about true faith (iman)," and the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) answered: "It is to believe in Allah, His angels, His inspired Books, His messengers, the Last Day, and in destiny, its good and evil."

"You have spoken the truth," he said, "Now tell me about the perfection of faith (ihsan)," and the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) answered: "It is to worship Allah as if you see Him, and if you see Him not, He nevertheless sees you."
~ Sahih Muslim, 1.37, hadith 8

(Incidentally, this man in pure white clothing was actually the angel Gabriel alayhissalam). And what is this corresponding science to ihsan? Yep, you guessed it, tasawwuf.  How tasawwuf is performed can vary greatly, from endeavouring to improve one's concentration during prayer to performance of the famous sema ritual. Regardless, no one can deny its status as the heart of the religion. This heart cannot exist without its body, and the body cannot exist without the heart.

The use of the word 'Sufism' suggests the externalization of tasawwuf into a seperate sect of its own. The heart is ripped out of the body and zombiefied into a kind of fringe-cult which exists in contradiction to Islam. It is held that a 'Sufi' cannot possibly be an orthodox Muslim, and that an orthodox Muslim cannot possibly be a 'Sufi'.

And what is the result of this? Muslims are killing each other over supposed deviancy, and centuries-old spiritual heritage is being erased in the name of purifying the religion. Neoconservative think-tanks advocate the cooption of 'Sufism' to use in a divide-and-conquer strategy to serve the interests of their political masters. And some Muslims play straight into their hands by setting up 'Sufi' organizations defined in opposition to the mainstream, claiming to represent the 'real Islam' as if everybody else's 'Islam' is fake and labelling everybody who disagrees with them as 'Wahabi'.

Screw all this, man.

Sufism is dead, long live tasawwuf.

Recommended reading:

The Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islamic Sciences

Sunday, July 4, 2010

What's in a Name Part XVIVXIXIXIXIXIXIXIXI

I found out in the newspaper the other day that 41 people were killed and 175 injured in a bombing at a Sufi shrine in Lahore (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/bombers-target-heart-of-liberal-islam-in-pakistan/story-e6frg6so-1225887291875). My heart filled with rage – but not because of the actual incident itself. Astaghfirullah, something else was the initial cause of my anger.

That article was the front-pager and plastered all over the top in big bold letters was the titleBombers target heart of liberal Islam', in a move that ‘appeared designed to inflame sectarian tensions’. The article goes on to state ‘Lahore is a sort of mecca for Sufism, the liberal, mystical arm of Islam that rejects the concept of jihad and promotes spiritual development through music and prayer’, finishing with a mention of an earlier attack on two Ahmadi mosques.

This piece is a near-perfect example of the hackneyed, reductionist and misleading use of language that newspaper editors and journalists seem so fond of, especially when writing about topics related (or not – religious profiling of delinquent youths, anyone?) to Islam. Complex phenomenon are reduced to easily-digestible categories that pit good versus evil, ‘liberal’ versus ‘conservative’ in a Manichean struggle, for the entertainment of the plebiscite.

As one who is highly empathetic to Sufism, I take it I am a ‘liberal’ then. So what the heck does that mean? That I listen to popular western music (I don’t)? Go to nightclubs (nope)? Wear revealing clothing (I don’t even wear shorts in the Australian summer)? Am I really the same as, for example, the westernized descendents of upper-class Iranian exiles who may do all of the above? On the other hand, I can tell you for a fact that I feel uncomfortable being at the same table with someone with a glass of bubbly. I also pray five times a day, which usually would have marked me as a backward zealot except that according to this article my that is something I do a a means to lovey-dovey spiritual enlightenment (presumably other Muslims don’t pray?).

Oh yes, and I reject jihad! Damn the fact that ‘jihad’ is the term used to mean anything a Muslim might undertake to ‘struggle’ for the perfection of his/other people’s Islam, and can range from refusing to have that extra cookie in the jar, to smiling whenever one greets another person, to defending Jerusalem from the forces of Richard the Lionheart! Damn the fact that so many of the greatest heroes and defenders of the Muslim peoples and upholders of chivalry and honour have been Sufis. Presumably Imam Shamil and Abd al-Qadir al Jazairi spent their days drinking tea and whining about what they could do to better integrate into Imperial society with those nice Russians and Frenchmen (a sausage-sizzle, perhaps?)!

And Sufism is implied to be a sect – but ‘Sufi’ itself is just a term used by westerners to categorise the expression of the science of the purification of the heart. It is a practice and a discipline. Sufism exists across the entire spectrum of Islam. Saying Sufism is a sect is like saying peanut butter is a type of bread. The Ahmadis, with their radically different beliefs, are indeed a sect – they themselves are named after their founder who believed he was the Messiah. Please do not compare us to them.

Criticism of such use of language may seem to be nit-picking, but such writings have a very real and very serious effect in the real world. If one controls language, one controls the way people think, and the media wields huge power and responsibility. I strongly do not appreciate the implication that in order to be seen as more acceptable to western society, I have to be a lesser Muslim, and that those who indiscriminately murder are somehow judged as being ‘more’ Muslim. I do not appreciate the caricature of Islamic spiritual practices and the implication that the only acceptable Muslim is one who unquestioningly devours current western trends and fashions. The pigeonholing of Muslims into ‘liberal/moderate’ and ‘conservative/radical’, in denying any complexity to us, effectively denies our humanity, reinforces the world-view of the terrorists, insults the victims of the bomb attack under the façade of mourning and shackles any real attempts to achieve meaningful international relations and inter-religious understanding